A whistleblower is a person who exposes a certain activity or information in or on an organization. Other spellings for the term are whistle blower and whistle-blower. The information or activity exposed is usually deemed wrong, illegal, or unethical within the organization whether public or private. It may be necessary to flee or seek legal protection after whistleblowing because there may be some form of retaliation from concerned subjects. To learn more regarding a whistleblower San Bernardino CA offers a good place to make a visit.
The word whistleblower derives from the whistle used in games by referees when signaling illegal or foul play. The coining of the term occurred in the 1970s by someone known as Ralph Nader. The term was coined in a bid to alleviate the negative connotations associated with the practice when referred to using words like snitch and informer.
There are many ways of classifying information of alleged wrongdoing. Some of these ways include violation of company policy, regulation or law, threat to public interest, threat to national security, corruption, and fraud. The allegations of wrongdoing can be brought to the surface either internally or externally. Most whistle-blowers can be classified as internal whistle-blowers. That means that they report the information on wrongdoing to their superiors or fellow employees within the organization.
Most organizations have installed systems for employers to make reports on misconduct. Systems that provide employees with a choice of options when making reports are more effective according to research. Workers need to feel safe by having their confidentiality maintained. Anonymous reporting mechanisms lead to increased reports on misconduct in organizations. This is because there is no fear for retaliation.
External whistle-blowers are the second category of whistle-blowers. These ones report the information they have regarding misdoings to third parties, that is, persons or entities. The third party is usually not a person within the same organization. The choice of the third party to report to usually depends on the nature and severity of the misconduct. Some of the most common third parties external whistle-blowers contact includes watchdog agencies, law enforcement agencies, the media, and lawyers.
Whistleblowers are increasingly being retaliated against when they use conventional mechanisms of whistleblowing. To counter this problem, another method that involves the use of third parties has come up. In this method, third parties take the responsibility of bringing the attention of the management of the concerned organization to the misconduct. The whistle-blower does not get revealed in this process. One organization that offers this kind of service is the International Whistleblowers.
Legal protection is often provided to whistle blowers by most countries. The provision of legal protection differs among countries and is dictated by several factors. Some major factors affecting provision of legal protection to whistle blowers include where secrets were revealed, country of original activity, how secrets were revealed, and how misconduct was publicized.
Whistleblowing requires one to be very brave given the kind of retaliation whistle blower are likely to face. Negative consequences of whistleblowing is almost endless. The list includes isolation, social stigmatization, humiliation, broken promises to have the problem fixed, assassination of character, formal reprimand, difficult court proceedings, and disillusionment among others.
The word whistleblower derives from the whistle used in games by referees when signaling illegal or foul play. The coining of the term occurred in the 1970s by someone known as Ralph Nader. The term was coined in a bid to alleviate the negative connotations associated with the practice when referred to using words like snitch and informer.
There are many ways of classifying information of alleged wrongdoing. Some of these ways include violation of company policy, regulation or law, threat to public interest, threat to national security, corruption, and fraud. The allegations of wrongdoing can be brought to the surface either internally or externally. Most whistle-blowers can be classified as internal whistle-blowers. That means that they report the information on wrongdoing to their superiors or fellow employees within the organization.
Most organizations have installed systems for employers to make reports on misconduct. Systems that provide employees with a choice of options when making reports are more effective according to research. Workers need to feel safe by having their confidentiality maintained. Anonymous reporting mechanisms lead to increased reports on misconduct in organizations. This is because there is no fear for retaliation.
External whistle-blowers are the second category of whistle-blowers. These ones report the information they have regarding misdoings to third parties, that is, persons or entities. The third party is usually not a person within the same organization. The choice of the third party to report to usually depends on the nature and severity of the misconduct. Some of the most common third parties external whistle-blowers contact includes watchdog agencies, law enforcement agencies, the media, and lawyers.
Whistleblowers are increasingly being retaliated against when they use conventional mechanisms of whistleblowing. To counter this problem, another method that involves the use of third parties has come up. In this method, third parties take the responsibility of bringing the attention of the management of the concerned organization to the misconduct. The whistle-blower does not get revealed in this process. One organization that offers this kind of service is the International Whistleblowers.
Legal protection is often provided to whistle blowers by most countries. The provision of legal protection differs among countries and is dictated by several factors. Some major factors affecting provision of legal protection to whistle blowers include where secrets were revealed, country of original activity, how secrets were revealed, and how misconduct was publicized.
Whistleblowing requires one to be very brave given the kind of retaliation whistle blower are likely to face. Negative consequences of whistleblowing is almost endless. The list includes isolation, social stigmatization, humiliation, broken promises to have the problem fixed, assassination of character, formal reprimand, difficult court proceedings, and disillusionment among others.
About the Author:
If you are looking for the facts about a whistleblower San Bernardino CA locals can come to our web pages here today. Additional details are available at http://www.skassellaw.com now.
Posts
0 comments:
Post a Comment